linux-kernel - Re: general protection fault in sock_def_error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANX2M5YeOHGnNYhMsOLPg28_3tQXTCs=vLY2CFMXDxWR_g8P+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:47:37 -0700
From:   Dipanjan Das <mail.dipanjan.das@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
        sashal@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
        steffen.klassert@...unet.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller@...glegroups.com, fleischermarius@...glemail.com,
        its.priyanka.bose@...il.com
Subject: Re: general protection fault in sock_def_error_report

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:44 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> As you must have tested this, can you provide a properly backported
> version of this commit for the 5.4.y and 5.10.y trees, as it does not
> apply cleanly as-is.
>
> Please submit it to stable@...r.kernel.org and we will be glad to apply
> it.

Of course. Please allow us to take a couple of days. We will get back
with a backported patch.

-- 
Thanks and Regards,

Dipanjan