[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2b40d05-5f1d-0e56-b530-ce6d61be7b8a@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 09:51:54 +0200
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
CC: "snitzer@...nel.org" <snitzer@...nel.org>,
"matias.bjorling@....com" <matias.bjorling@....com>,
"Johannes.Thumshirn@....com" <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
"gost.dev@...sung.com" <gost.dev@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com" <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"pankydev8@...il.com" <pankydev8@...il.com>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"jaegeuk@...nel.org" <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/11] null_blk: allow non power of 2 zoned devices
On 2022-07-27 23:59, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> Sequential Write:
>>
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | IOdepth | 8 | 16 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | Without patch | 578 | 2257 | 12.80 | 576 | 2248 | 25.78 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | With patch | 581 | 2268 | 12.74 | 576 | 2248 | 25.85 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>>
>> Sequential read:
>>
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | IOdepth | 8 | 16 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | Without patch | 667 | 2605 | 11.79 | 675 | 2637 | 23.49 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | With patch | 667 | 2605 | 11.79 | 675 | 2638 | 23.48 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>>
>> Random read:
>>
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | IOdepth | 8 | 16 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) | KIOPS |BW(MiB/s) | Lat(usec) |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | Without patch | 522 | 2038 | 15.05 | 514 | 2006 | 30.87 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>> | With patch | 522 | 2039 | 15.04 | 523 | 2042 | 30.33 |
>> x-----------------x---------------------------------x---------------------------------x
>>
>> Minor variations are noticed in Sequential write with io depth 8 and
>> in random read with io depth 16. But overall no noticeable differences
>> were noticed
>
> minor variations in with aspect of the performance ?
> are these documented somewhere ?
>
The table above documents those minor variations in performance.
> move the large table of performance numbers to the cover letter it looks
> ugly in the git log...
>
I could do that.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists