[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcqtO5E91e5HxM6qN3gcMH5-_h=508chyDiWzvmLiFn6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 12:47:35 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Wei Ming Chen <jj251510319013@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linux Documentation List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drivers: serial: earlycon: Pass device-tree node
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 9:57 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:04:24PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 4:41 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 05:28:18PM +0300, Markuss Broks wrote:
...
> > > > + unsigned long node;
> > >
> > > That should not be an unsigned long, but rather an 'int'. Something got
> > > messed up, of_setup_earlycon() should be changed to reflect this before
> > > propagating the error to other places in the kernel.
> >
> > It's a pointer, but what puzzles me, why it can't be declared as a such:
> >
> > struct device_node *node;
> >
> > ?
>
> It should not be a pointer, trace things backwards, it comes from a call
> to of_setup_earlycon() from early_init_dt_scan_chosen_stdout() which has
> offset declared as an int, and then does:
> if (of_setup_earlycon(match, offset, options) == 0)
>
> So why would it be a node?
This is a very good question.
> > > And it's not really a "node" but an "offset", right?
> >
> > Seems no.
>
> Really? What am I missing here?
It's me who is missing something here, thanks for your elaboration!
After it it becomes clear that your first question should be
addressed.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists