[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YuPb141ykzLTWLbC@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 15:08:39 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Pandey, Radhey Shyam" <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
Cc: "michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com" <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"ronak.jain@...inx.com" <ronak.jain@...inx.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"git@...inx.com" <git@...inx.com>, "git (AMD-Xilinx)" <git@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: macb: Add zynqmp SGMII dynamic
configuration support
> > > How robust is this? What if somebody specified a different power domain?
> >
> > Some background - init_reset_optional() fn is implemented for three
> > platforms i.e., zynqmp, versal, MPFS.
> >
> > zynqmp_pm_set_gem_config API expect first argument as GEM node id so,
> > power-domain DT property is passed to get node ID.
> >
> > However, power-domain property is read only if underlying firmware
> > supports configuration of GEM secure space. It's only true for zynqmp SGMII
> > case and for zynqmp power domain is fixed.
> > In addition to it there is an error handling in power-domain property parsing.
> > Hope this answers the question.
>
> Please let me know the implementation looks fine or needs any modification?
Given that explanation, it looks fine.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists