[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220730010056.7CF6BC433D6@smtp.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 18:00:54 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: abelvesa@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] clk: imx: remove unnecessary NULL check of clk
Quoting Yang Yingliang (2022-06-30 07:13:08)
> It has NULL check in clk_prepare_enable(), so it no need
> to check the clk before calling it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/clk.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> index 5582f18dd632..1c5d5b957c96 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> @@ -189,9 +189,7 @@ void imx_register_uart_clocks(unsigned int clk_count)
> if (IS_ERR(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks]))
> return;
>
> - /* Only enable the clock if it's not NULL */
> - if (imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks])
> - clk_prepare_enable(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks++]);
> + clk_prepare_enable(imx_uart_clocks[imx_enabled_uart_clocks++]);
Nak
The ++ operator has side-effects, which wasn't the case before this
patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists