[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6f58760-d352-37e1-beac-b1213e4500b0@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 21:45:09 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Zhu Tony <tony.zhu@...el.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 08/12] iommu/sva: Refactoring
iommu_sva_bind/unbind_device()
On 2022/7/31 20:36, Yi Liu wrote:
> On 2022/7/5 13:07, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The existing iommu SVA interfaces are implemented by calling the SVA
>> specific iommu ops provided by the IOMMU drivers. There's no need for
>> any SVA specific ops in iommu_ops vector anymore as we can achieve
>> this through the generic attach/detach_dev_pasid domain ops.
>
> s/"attach/detach_dev_pasid"/"set/block_pasid_dev"/
Updated. By the way, as discussed, block_pasid_dev will be dropped since
the next version. It's actually setting group's blocking domain.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists