linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 03/16] rv/include: Add helper functions for deterministic automata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Aug 2022 02:17:49 +0800
From:   Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>
To:     Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Gabriele Paoloni <gpaoloni@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 03/16] rv/include: Add helper functions for
 deterministic automata

On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 06:02:47PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 7/31/22 17:13, Tao Zhou wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 11:38:42AM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >> +static inline type model_get_next_state_##name(enum states_##name curr_state,	\
> >> +					       enum events_##name event)	\
> >> +{										\
> >> +	if ((curr_state < 0) || (curr_state >= state_max_##name))		\
> >> +		return INVALID_STATE;						\
> >> +										\
> >> +	if ((event < 0) || (event >= event_max_##name))				\
> >> +		return INVALID_STATE;						\
> > 
> > Should define the INVALID_EVENT corresponding to event invalid case.
> 
> no.

Absolutly I lost here, this is for *get next state*, must return
a state info.

> 
> -- Daniel