[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.2207310703170.14394@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2022 07:43:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add a read memory barrier to wait_on_buffer
Let's have a look at this piece of code in __bread_slow:
get_bh(bh);
bh->b_end_io = end_buffer_read_sync;
submit_bh(REQ_OP_READ, 0, bh);
wait_on_buffer(bh);
if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
return bh;
Neither wait_on_buffer nor buffer_uptodate contain a memory barrier.
Consequently, if someone calls sb_bread and then reads the buffer data,
the read of buffer data may be speculatively executed before
wait_on_buffer(bh) and it may return invalid data.
Also, there is this pattern present several times:
wait_on_buffer(bh);
if (!buffer_uptodate(bh))
err = -EIO;
It may be possible that buffer_uptodate is executed before wait_on_buffer
and it may return spurious error.
Fix these bugs by adding a read memory barrier to wait_on_buffer().
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/buffer_head.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/buffer_head.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/buffer_head.h
@@ -353,6 +353,11 @@ static inline void wait_on_buffer(struct
might_sleep();
if (buffer_locked(bh))
__wait_on_buffer(bh);
+ /*
+ * Make sure that the following accesses to buffer state or buffer data
+ * are not reordered with buffer_locked(bh).
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
}
static inline int trylock_buffer(struct buffer_head *bh)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists