[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220801034538epcms2p270ca60820681d09de109a2df504a3806@epcms2p2>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 12:45:38 +0900
From: Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"adrian.hunter@...el.com" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE:(2) [PATCH v5 2/6] scsi: ufs: wb: Change functions name and
modify parameter name
>On 7/28/22 21:54, Jinyoung CHOI wrote:
>> -static inline void ufshcd_wb_config(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>> +static void ufshcd_wb_set_default_flags(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>
>It is not clear to me why the new name is considered an improvement? The
>old name looks better to me. If you want to rename this function anyway,
>how about ufshcd_configure_wb()?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bart.
It is desirable to express it as configure because it sets several values.
I will change it.
Thank you for your opinion.
Kind Regards,
Jinyoung.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists