[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <def8e47c-067e-0841-4ae4-1eb90244cd50@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 22:41:40 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] drm/gem: Add LRU/shrinker helper
On 7/26/22 20:50, Rob Clark wrote:
> +/**
> + * drm_gem_lru_remove - remove object from whatever LRU it is in
> + *
> + * If the object is currently in any LRU, remove it.
> + *
> + * @obj: The GEM object to remove from current LRU
> + */
> +void
> +drm_gem_lru_remove(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> +{
> + struct drm_gem_lru *lru = obj->lru;
> +
> + if (!lru)
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(lru->lock);
> + lru_remove(obj);
> + mutex_unlock(lru->lock);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_lru_remove);
I made a preliminary port of the DRM-SHMEM shrinker on top of the the
latest version of dma-buf locking convention and yours LRU patches. It
all works good, the only thing that is missing for the DRM-SHMEM
shrinker is the drm_gem_lru_remove_locked().
What about to add a locked variant of drm_gem_lru_remove()?
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists