[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR12MB27676E6CEDF242F2D33CA2AB8E9A9@SN6PR12MB2767.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 23:57:09 +0000
From: "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"jroedel@...e.de" <jroedel@...e.de>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"slp@...hat.com" <slp@...hat.com>,
"pgonda@...gle.com" <pgonda@...gle.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com" <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
"tobin@....com" <tobin@....com>,
"Roth, Michael" <Michael.Roth@....com>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"kirill@...temov.name" <kirill@...temov.name>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"marcorr@...gle.com" <marcorr@...gle.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"alpergun@...gle.com" <alpergun@...gle.com>,
"dgilbert@...hat.com" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH Part2 v6 07/49] x86/sev: Invalid pages from direct map
when adding it to RMP table
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Hello Boris,
>> Subject: x86/sev: Invalid pages from direct map when adding it to RMP
>> table
>"...: Invalidate pages from the direct map when adding them to the RMP table"
Ok
>> +static int restore_direct_map(u64 pfn, int npages) {
>> + int i, ret = 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
>> + ret = set_direct_map_default_noflush(pfn_to_page(pfn + i));
>set_memory_p() ?
You mean set_memory_present() ?
Is there an issue with not using set_direct_map_default_noflush(), it is easier to correlate with
this function and it's functionality of restoring the page in the kernel direct map ?
> + if (ret)
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> +cleanup:
> + WARN(ret > 0, "Failed to restore direct map for pfn 0x%llx\n", pfn +
> +i);
>Warn for each pfn?!
>That'll flood dmesg mightily.
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int invalid_direct_map(unsigned long pfn, int npages) {
> + int i, ret = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < npages; i++) {
> + ret = set_direct_map_invalid_noflush(pfn_to_page(pfn + i));
>As above, set_memory_np() doesn't work here instead of looping over each page?
Yes, set_memory_np() looks more efficient to use instead of looping over each page.
But again, calling set_direct_map_invalid_noflush() is easier to understand from the
calling function's point of view as it correlates to the functionality of invalidating the
page from kernel direct map ?
>> + if (val->assigned) {
>> + if (invalid_direct_map(pfn, npages)) {
>. + pr_err("Failed to unmap pfn 0x%llx pages %d from direct_map\n",
>"Failed to unmap %d pages at pfn 0x... from the direct map\n"
Ok.
>> + if (!ret && !val->assigned) {
>> + if (restore_direct_map(pfn, npages)) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to map pfn 0x%llx pages %d in direct_map\n",
>"Failed to map %d pages at pfn 0x... into the direct map\n"
Ok.
Thanks,
Ashish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists