[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yud6KHZXKP+1EAGl@e120937-lin>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 08:01:11 +0100
From: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To: Arun KS <arunks.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, souvik.chakravarty@....com,
peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/16] selftests: arm64: Add initial SCMI testcases
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 11:02:28AM +0530, Arun KS wrote:
> Hi Cristian,
Hi Arun,
sorry I found this mail a bit garbled and with HTML, I'll answer below
what I could see.
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 12:16 PM Cristian Marussi
> <[1]cristian.marussi@....com> wrote:
> >
> > A few initial testcases for Clock and Sensot protocol plus all the
> test
> > infrastructure, including the test runeer.
> >
> > All of this just an experimental demonstrator.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <[2]cristian.marussi@....com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile | 2 +-
> > tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/Makefile | 6 +
> > tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/config | 1 +
> > .../arm64/scmi/kselftest_scmi_lib.sh | 118
> ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../selftests/arm64/scmi/run_scmi_tests.sh | 69 ++++++++++
> > .../testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_enable.sh | 33 +++++
> > .../protocol_0x14/clock_rate_read.sh | 18 +++
> > .../protocol_0x14/clock_rate_write.sh | 29 +++++
> > .../testcases/protocol_0x15/sensor_reading.sh | 17 +++
> > 9 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/config
> > create mode 100644
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/kselftest_scmi_lib.sh
> > create mode 100755
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/run_scmi_tests.sh
> > create mode 100755
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_enable
> .sh
> > create mode 100755
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_rate_r
> ead.sh
> > create mode 100755
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_rate_w
> rite.sh
> > create mode 100755
> tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x15/sensor_readi
> ng.sh
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> > index 1e8d9a8f59df..6648dd8e2173 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile
> > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> > ARCH ?= $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
> >
> > ifneq (,$(filter $(ARCH),aarch64 arm64))
> > -ARM64_SUBTARGETS ?= tags signal pauth fp mte bti abi
> > +ARM64_SUBTARGETS ?= tags signal pauth fp mte bti abi scmi
> > else
> > ARM64_SUBTARGETS :=
> > endif
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/Makefile
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8786d8d4c332
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +TEST_PROGS := run_scmi_tests.sh
> > +TEST_FILES := kselftest_scmi_lib.sh testcases/*
> > +
> > +include ../../[3]lib.mk
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/config
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/config
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..161387084a3f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/config
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TEST_DRIVER=y
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/kselftest_scmi_lib.sh
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/kselftest_scmi_lib.sh
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..54d27b5f3e1a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/kselftest_scmi_lib.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +SCMI_TEST_DRV="scmi_test_driver"
> > +TRES=(0 0 0)
> > +
> > +ksft_log()
> > +{
> > + echo -e "[SCMI]: $1"
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_skip()
> > +{
> > + echo -e "[SKIP]: $1"
> > + exit 4
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_pass()
> > +{
> > + echo -e "[PASS]: $1"
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_fail()
> > +{
> > + echo -e "[FAIL]: $1"
> > + exit 1
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_results()
> > +{
> > + if [ $# -gt 0 ]; then
> > + local val
> > + local idx
> > + local ret=$1
> > +
> > + case "$ret" in
> > + 0)
> > + idx=0
> > + ;;
> > + 4)
> > + idx=1
> > + ;;
> > + *)
> > + idx=2
> > + ;;
> > + esac
> > + val=${TRES[${idx}]}
> > + TRES[$idx]=$((val + 1))
> > + else
> > + ksft_log "Summary - PASS[${TRES[0]}]
> SKIP[${TRES[1]}] FAIL[${TRES[2]}]"
> > + [ "x${TRES[2]}" != "x0" ] && exit 1
> > + [ "x${TRES[1]}" != "x0" -a "x${TRES[0]}" == "x0" ] &&
> exit 4
> > + exit 0
> > + fi
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_scmi_run_one()
> > +{
> > + tcase=$1
> > +
> > + echo "-> Running testcase: $tcase"
> > +
> > + ./$tcase
> > + ret=$?
> > +
> > + ksft_results $ret
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_scmi_check_fw_version()
> > +{
> > + local supported=$1
> > + local current="${SCMI_VENDOR}:${SCMI_SUB_VENDOR}"
> > +
> > + if [ "x${current}" != "x${supported}" ]; then
> > + ksft_skip "Current FW('$current') is UNSUPPORTED.
> Should be '$supported'"
No, because I want to write out that the FW currently found running is
not supported by this test.
> > + fi
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_scmi_transport_is_atomic ()
> > +{
> > + [ "x$SCMI_TRANSPORT_IS_ATOMIC" == "xY" ] && return 0 ||
> return 1
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_scmi_protocol_resources_get()
> > +{
> > + local proto_dir=$1
> > + local resources=""
> > +
> > + for d in ${proto_dir}/*; do
> > + rd="$(basename $d)"
> > + [[ $rd =~ [0-9] ]] && resources="$resources $rd"
> > + done
> > +
> > + echo "$resources"
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_scmi_value_get()
> > +{
> > + local syspath=$1
> > + local __retval=$2
> > + local value
> > +
> > + value=$(cat $syspath)
> > + [ "x$?" != "x0" ] && ksft_fail "Fail to read $syspath"
> > +
> > + eval $__retval="'$value'"
> > +}
> > +
> > +ksft_scmi_value_set()
> > +{
> > + local syspath=$1
> > + local value=$2
> > +
> > + echo $value > $syspath
> > + [ "x$?" != "x0" ] && ksft_fail "Fail to write $syspath -
> err:$?"
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/run_scmi_tests.sh
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/run_scmi_tests.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 000000000000..f372744a4579
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/run_scmi_tests.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +. ./kselftest_scmi_lib.sh
> > +
> > +check_root_privs()
> > +{
> > + [ x"$(id -u)" != "x0" ] && ksft_skip "You need to be root"
> > +}
> > +
> > +check_scmi_testing_stack()
> > +{
> > + local debugfs_root=$(findmnt -o TARGET -t debugfs | grep -v
> TARGET)
> > + export SCMI_DEBUGFS_TOPDIR="$debugfs_root/scmi"
> > +
> > + # Try to load module if not builtin
> > + if [ ! -d $SCMI_DEBUGFS_TOPDIR ]; then
> > + modprobe $SCMI_TEST_DRV || ksft_skip "Failed to load
> $SCMI_TEST_DRV"
> > + [ ! -d $SCMI_DEBUGFS_TOPDIR ] && ksft_skip "SCMI Test
> stack not found; is CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_TEST_DRIVER enabled ?"
> > + fi
> > +}
> > +
> > +setup_scmi_test_env()
> > +{
> > + local scmi_info_dir="${SCMI_DEBUGFS_TOPDIR}/info/"
> > +
> > + export SCMI_VENDOR="$(cat ${scmi_info_dir}/vendor_id)"
> > + export SCMI_SUB_VENDOR="$(cat
> ${scmi_info_dir}/sub_vendor_id)"
> > + export SCMI_VERS_MAJ="$(cat ${scmi_info_dir}/major_ver)"
> > + export SCMI_VERS_MIN="$(cat ${scmi_info_dir}/minor_ver)"
> > + export SCMI_VERS_IMPL="$(cat ${scmi_info_dir}/impl_ver)"
> > +
> > + ksft_log "Found stack: $SCMI_VENDOR/$SCMI_SUB_VENDOR
> ${SCMI_VERS_MAJ}.${SCMI_VERS_MAJ} - $SCMI_VERS_IMPL"
> > +
> > + SCMI_TEST_PROTOS=""
> > + for p in ${SCMI_DEBUGFS_TOPDIR}/protocol_*; do
> > + SCMI_TEST_PROTOS="${SCMI_TEST_PROTOS} $(basename $p)"
> > + done
> > +
> > + ksft_log "Found testing protocols: $SCMI_TEST_PROTOS"
> > +
> > + export SCMI_TEST_PROTOS
> > + SCMI_TRANSPORT_IS_ATOMIC="N"
> > + [ -d "${SCMI_DEBUGFS_TOPDIR}/transport" ] &&
> > + SCMI_TRANSPORT_IS_ATOMIC=$(cat
> "${SCMI_DEBUGFS_TOPDIR}/transport/is_atomic")
> > + export SCMI_TRANSPORT_IS_ATOMIC
> > +}
> > +
> > +# Setup
> > +check_root_privs
> > +
> > +check_scmi_testing_stack
> > +
> > +setup_scmi_test_env
> > +
> > +# Main
> > +# Run all available tests for the found protocols
> > +#
> > +for proto_dir in $SCMI_TEST_PROTOS; do
> > + [ ! -d $proto_dir ] && ksft_log "$proto_dir tests NOT
> supported." && continue
> > + export TST_PROTO_DIR="${SCMI_DEBUGFS_TOPDIR}/${proto_dir}"
> > + TST_PROTO_VERSION=$(cat ${TST_PROTO_DIR}/version)
> > + ksft_log "Running tests for SCMI $proto_dir
> ver:$TST_PROTO_VERSION"
> > + for tst in $proto_dir/*; do
> > + ksft_scmi_run_one $tst
> > + done
> > +done
> > +
> > +ksft_results
> > diff --git
> a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_enab
> le.sh
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_enab
> le.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 000000000000..4cdf3a097ba7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_enab
> le.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +. ./kselftest_scmi_lib.sh
> > +
> > +supported_fw="EMU-SCMI-VM:userland"
> > +ksft_scmi_check_fw_version $supported_fw
> > +
> > +clock_enable_disable() {
> > + rname=$1
> > + rdir=$2
> > + clk_op=$3
> > +
> > + ksft_scmi_value_set $rdir/$clk_op Y
> > + ksft_scmi_value_set $rdir/$clk_op N
> > + ksft_log "Clock $rname: $clk_op - ON/OFF ... OK"
> > +}
> > +
> > +resources=$(ksft_scmi_protocol_resources_get $TST_PROTO_DIR)
> > +ksft_log "Found Clock resources: $resources"
> > +
> > +for res in $resources;do
> > + resd="$TST_PROTO_DIR/$res"
> > + name="$(cat $resd/info/name)"
> > +
> > + clock_enable_disable $name $resd "enable"
> > + if [ ksft_transport_is_atomic ]; then
> > + clock_enable_disable $name $resd
> "enable_atomic_irqs_off"
> > + clock_enable_disable $name $resd
> "enable_atomic_irqs_on"
> > + fi
> > +done
> > +
> > +ksft_pass "$0"
> > diff --git
> a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_rate
> _read.sh
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_rate
> _read.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 000000000000..88c444fd317d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_rate
> _read.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +. ./kselftest_scmi_lib.sh
> > +
> > +resources=$(ksft_scmi_protocol_resources_get $TST_PROTO_DIR)
> > +ksft_log "Found Clock resources: $resources"
> > +
> > +for res in $resources;do
> > + resd="$TST_PROTO_DIR/$res"
> > + name="$(cat $resd/info/name)"
> > + val=0
> > +
> > + ksft_scmi_value_get $resd/rate_get_set val
> > + ksft_log "$name READ => $val"
> > +done
> > +
> > +ksft_pass "$0"
> > diff --git
> a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_rate
> _write.sh
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_rate
> _write.sh
> > new file mode 100755
> > index 000000000000..346084ec3812
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
> b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/scmi/testcases/protocol_0x14/clock_rate
> _write.sh
> > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > +#!/bin/bash
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +. ./kselftest_scmi_lib.sh
> > +
> > +supported_fw="EMU-SCMI-VM:userland"
> > +ksft_scmi_check_fw_version $supported_fw
> > +
> > +resources=$(ksft_scmi_protocol_resources_get $TST_PROTO_DIR)
> > +ksft_log "Found Clock resources: $resources"
> > +
> > +for res in $resources;do
> > + resd="$TST_PROTO_DIR/$res"
> > + name="$(cat $resd/info/name)"
> > + val=0
> > + oldval=0
> > + setval=0
> > +
> > + ksft_scmi_value_get $resd/rate_get_set oldval
> > + setval=$((oldval + 666))
> significance of 666?
Just a stupid dummy value that stands-out in my log when
testing this series .... clearly won't be the value in the final series.
> > +
> > + ksft_scmi_value_set $resd/rate_get_set $setval
> when setval is not a valid option(not in the list of possible clock
> rates),
> rate_get_set returns non zero value and ksft_scmi_value_set() calls
> ksft_fail()
> and then an exit. Is this what is intended to do?
Probably not, this should expect a failure...thanks.
Thanks,
Cristian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists