[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7d202457150472588df0bd3b7334b3f@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 07:46:22 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [for-next][PATCH 21/21] tracing: Use a struct alignof to
determine trace event field alignment
From: Steven Rostedt
> Sent: 31 July 2022 20:04
>
> alignof() gives an alignment of types as they would be as standalone
> variables. But alignment in structures might be different, and when
> building the fields of events, the alignment must be the actual
> alignment otherwise the field offsets may not match what they actually
> are.
>
> This caused trace-cmd to crash, as libtraceevent did not check if the
> field offset was bigger than the event. The write_msr and read_msr
> events on 32 bit had their fields incorrect, because it had a u64 field
> between two ints. alignof(u64) would give 8, but the u64 field was at a
> 4 byte alignment.
>
> Define a macro as:
>
> ALIGN_STRUCTFIELD(type) ((int)(offsetof(struct {char a; type b;}, b)))
>
> which gives the actual alignment of types in a structure.
The simpler:
__alignof__(struct {type b;})
also works.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists