[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220801091735.GB3460@kadam>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 12:17:36 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Larry.Finger@...inger.net, paskripkin@...il.com, martin@...ser.cx,
straube.linux@...il.com, fmdefrancesco@...il.com,
abdun.nihaal@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: r8188eu: convert rtw_set_802_11_add_wep
error code semantics
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 10:12:56AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > I'm happy of course to rewrite this to address any concerns, but
> > I was hoping I could clarify what you've said though? Apologies if I've
> > missed it, but how is this function now returning 1 on success? It sets
> > ret to 0 (success) at the start and then sets it to one of two negative
> > error codes depending on what happens. Am I missing something here?
> > (Perfectly possible that I am).
> >
> > In terms of do nothing gotos, do you mean gotos that just set an error
> > code then jump to the end? If you'd prefer, as the function just returns
> > right after the exit label, I can just return the codes directly and have
> > a 'return 0;' like you say above?
> >
> > Thanks as always for your insight.
>
> Yes, you've got it right.
>
> I think Dan is suggesting something like the below, but
> not necessarily in a single patch:
I always like your style, Joe.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists