[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202208011814.gx9OZFDF-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:29:42 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Stanley Chu <chu.stanley@...il.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ufs: core: ufshcd: use local_clock() for debugging
timestamps
Hi Daniil,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on jejb-scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next linus/master v5.19 next-20220728]
[cannot apply to bvanassche/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Daniil-Lunev/ufs-core-ufshcd-use-local_clock-for-debugging-timestamps/20220801-123157
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git for-next
config: i386-randconfig-a005 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220801/202208011814.gx9OZFDF-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/45a46347597e5c368c27a9fe01e400af675eb5e9
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Daniil-Lunev/ufs-core-ufshcd-use-local_clock-for-debugging-timestamps/20220801-123157
git checkout 45a46347597e5c368c27a9fe01e400af675eb5e9
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/ufs/core/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c: In function 'ufshcd_send_command':
>> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:2143:46: error: implicit declaration of function 'local_clock'; did you mean 'local_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
2143 | lrbp->issue_time_stamp_local_clock = local_clock();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| local_lock
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +2143 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
2130
2131 /**
2132 * ufshcd_send_command - Send SCSI or device management commands
2133 * @hba: per adapter instance
2134 * @task_tag: Task tag of the command
2135 */
2136 static inline
2137 void ufshcd_send_command(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int task_tag)
2138 {
2139 struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[task_tag];
2140 unsigned long flags;
2141
2142 lrbp->issue_time_stamp = ktime_get();
> 2143 lrbp->issue_time_stamp_local_clock = local_clock();
2144 lrbp->compl_time_stamp = ktime_set(0, 0);
2145 lrbp->compl_time_stamp_local_clock = 0;
2146 ufshcd_add_command_trace(hba, task_tag, UFS_CMD_SEND);
2147 ufshcd_clk_scaling_start_busy(hba);
2148 if (unlikely(ufshcd_should_inform_monitor(hba, lrbp)))
2149 ufshcd_start_monitor(hba, lrbp);
2150
2151 spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
2152 if (hba->vops && hba->vops->setup_xfer_req)
2153 hba->vops->setup_xfer_req(hba, task_tag, !!lrbp->cmd);
2154 __set_bit(task_tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
2155 ufshcd_writel(hba, 1 << task_tag, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
2156 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
2157 }
2158
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists