linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 65/65] selftests: bpf: Dont run sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon,  1 Aug 2022 13:47:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 65/65] selftests: bpf: Dont run sk_lookup in verifier tests

From: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@...ux.alibaba.com>

From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>

commit b4f894633fa14d7d46ba7676f950b90a401504bb upstream.

sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't
play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte
input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting
bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case
for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here
doesn't reduce coverage.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-6-lmb@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c          |    4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
 	enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
 	uint8_t flags;
 	void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
-	uint8_t runs;
+	int runs;
 #define bpf_testdata_struct_t					\
 	struct {						\
 		uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;			\
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_te
 
 	run_errs = 0;
 	run_successes = 0;
-	if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) {
+	if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0 && test->runs >= 0) {
 		uint32_t expected_val;
 		int i;
 
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.runs = -1,
 },
 /* invalid 8-byte reads from a 4-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */
 {