lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220801132121.GE93763@thinkpad>
Date:   Mon, 1 Aug 2022 18:51:21 +0530
From:   Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 05/15] PCI: dwc: Introduce Synopsys IP-core
 versions/types interface

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 05:39:37PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Instead of manual DW PCIe data version field comparison let's use a handy
> macro-based interface in order to shorten out the statements, simplify the
> corresponding parts, improve the code readability and maintainability in
> perspective when more complex version-based dependencies need to
> implemented. Similar approaches have already been implemented in the DWC
> USB3 and DW SPI drivers (though with some IP-core evolution specifics).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c    |  2 +-
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c |  8 ++++----
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> index c4ab3d775a18..2a9bbde224af 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
> @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@ static int __init ks_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err_get_sync;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (pci->version >= DW_PCIE_VER_480A)
> +	if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 480A))
>  		ret = ks_pcie_am654_set_mode(dev, mode);
>  	else
>  		ret = ks_pcie_set_mode(dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index cbb36ccaa48b..bd575ad32bc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>  	val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
>  	if (upper_32_bits(limit_addr) > upper_32_bits(cpu_addr))
>  		val |= PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE;
> -	if (pci->version == DW_PCIE_VER_490A)
> +	if (dw_pcie_ver_is(pci, 490A))
>  		val = dw_pcie_enable_ecrc(val);
>  	dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL1, val);
>  	dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(pci, index, PCIE_ATU_UNR_REGION_CTRL2,
> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>  			   upper_32_bits(cpu_addr));
>  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_LIMIT,
>  			   lower_32_bits(limit_addr));
> -	if (pci->version >= DW_PCIE_VER_460A)
> +	if (dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 460A))
>  		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_UPPER_LIMIT,
>  				   upper_32_bits(limit_addr));
>  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET,
> @@ -369,9 +369,9 @@ static void __dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, u8 func_no,
>  			   upper_32_bits(pci_addr));
>  	val = type | PCIE_ATU_FUNC_NUM(func_no);
>  	if (upper_32_bits(limit_addr) > upper_32_bits(cpu_addr) &&
> -	    pci->version >= DW_PCIE_VER_460A)
> +	    dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(pci, 460A))
>  		val |= PCIE_ATU_INCREASE_REGION_SIZE;
> -	if (pci->version == DW_PCIE_VER_490A)
> +	if (dw_pcie_ver_is(pci, 490A))
>  		val = dw_pcie_enable_ecrc(val);
>  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR1, val);
>  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_ATU_CR2, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 7899808bdbc6..d247f227464c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,21 @@
>  #define DW_PCIE_VER_490A		0x3439302a
>  #define DW_PCIE_VER_520A		0x3532302a
>  
> +#define __dw_pcie_ver_cmp(_pci, _ver, _op) \
> +	((_pci)->version _op DW_PCIE_VER_ ## _ver)
> +
> +#define dw_pcie_ver_is(_pci, _ver) __dw_pcie_ver_cmp(_pci, _ver, ==)
> +
> +#define dw_pcie_ver_is_ge(_pci, _ver) __dw_pcie_ver_cmp(_pci, _ver, >=)
> +

The macro names are not very intuitive. But I cannot come with anything better.

> +#define dw_pcie_ver_type_is(_pci, _ver, _type) \
> +	(__dw_pcie_ver_cmp(_pci, _ver, ==) && \
> +	 __dw_pcie_ver_cmp(_pci, TYPE_ ## _type, ==))
> +
> +#define dw_pcie_ver_type_is_ge(_pci, _ver, _type) \
> +	(__dw_pcie_ver_cmp(_pci, _ver, ==) && \
> +	 __dw_pcie_ver_cmp(_pci, TYPE_ ## _type, >=))
> +

Are these macros used anywhere?

Thanks,
Mani

>  /* Parameters for the waiting for link up routine */
>  #define LINK_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES		10
>  #define LINK_WAIT_USLEEP_MIN		90000
> -- 
> 2.35.1
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ