linux-kernel - [PATCH 4/9] soc: sunxi: sram: Fix probe function ordering issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220801030509.21966-5-samuel@sholland.org>
Date:   Sun, 31 Jul 2022 22:05:04 -0500
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc:     Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] soc: sunxi: sram: Fix probe function ordering issues

Errors from debugfs are intended to be non-fatal, and should not prevent
the driver from probing.

Since debugfs file creation is treated as infallible, move it below the
parts of the probe function that can fail. This prevents an error
elsewhere in the probe function from causing the file to leak. Do the
same for the call to of_platform_populate().

Finally, checkpatch suggests an octal literal for the file permissions.

Fixes: 4af34b572a85 ("drivers: soc: sunxi: Introduce SoC driver to map SRAMs")
Fixes: 5828729bebbb ("soc: sunxi: export a regmap for EMAC clock reg on A64")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
---

 drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c
index a858a37fcdd4..52d07bed7664 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c
@@ -332,9 +332,9 @@ static struct regmap_config sunxi_sram_emac_clock_regmap = {
 
 static int __init sunxi_sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
-	struct dentry *d;
 	struct regmap *emac_clock;
 	const struct sunxi_sramc_variant *variant;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 
 	sram_dev = &pdev->dev;
 
@@ -346,13 +346,6 @@ static int __init sunxi_sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(base))
 		return PTR_ERR(base);
 
-	of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL, &pdev->dev);
-
-	d = debugfs_create_file("sram", S_IRUGO, NULL, NULL,
-				&sunxi_sram_fops);
-	if (!d)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
 	if (variant->num_emac_clocks > 0) {
 		emac_clock = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, base,
 						   &sunxi_sram_emac_clock_regmap);
@@ -361,6 +354,10 @@ static int __init sunxi_sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			return PTR_ERR(emac_clock);
 	}
 
+	of_platform_populate(dev->of_node, NULL, NULL, dev);
+
+	debugfs_create_file("sram", 0444, NULL, NULL, &sunxi_sram_fops);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.35.1