[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yuf5VQNrBHi7xG81@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 17:03:33 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: sun20i: Add support for Allwinner D1 LDOs
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 11:47:58PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> +static const struct regulator_desc sun20i_d1_analog_ldo_descs[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "aldo",
> + .supply_name = "vdd33",
> + .of_match = "aldo",
> + .ops = &sun20i_d1_analog_ldo_ops,
> + .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .n_voltages = BIT(3),
I'm really unconvinced that using BIT() is clearer than just writing the
number of voltages directly as a number.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists