linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for Xiaomi Poco F1 EBBG variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BY5PR02MB7009690D397E52593431E12CEA9D9@BY5PR02MB7009.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 03:18:43 +0530
From:   Joel Selvaraj <joel.selvaraj@...look.com>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for Xiaomi Poco F1 EBBG variant

Hi Dmitry Baryshkov

On 01/08/22 20:30, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 at 14:44, Joel Selvaraj <joel.selvaraj@...look.com> wrote:
>>
>> To be honest, I have no idea why my patch series doesn't get linked
>> properly. I think there is some issue in my OS. I use git format-patch
>> and git send-mail to send patches. It used to work fine. But it doesn't
>> want to work anymore :/ Is there a mailing list for sending test mails?
>> or how do I debug this? Kindly let me know if anyone has any
>> suggestions.
> 
> Judging from the following headers, it's not your OS, it is M$
> rewriting the headers.
> 
> Message-ID: <BY5PR02MB70099020AC1D181D15909F64EA9A9@...PR02MB7009.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
> X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID:
> <20220801112512.209047-1-joel.selvaraj@...look.com>
> 
> According to some mentions on the Internet, M$ relies on headers
> rewriting and will not change this behaviour.
> 
> I'd suggest switching to another SMTP submission host. I think it
> should be e.g. possible to tell GMail to send mails with @outlook.com
> addresses. However this might confuse some of the mail clients into
> believing it is spam since the email will SOFTFAIL the SPF check.
> 
> Switching to another mail provider might be an option too.

Thanks for the suggestion. Plan to switch the mail provider for the next
patch. Hope it goes well.

Best Regards,
Joel Selvaraj