[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGS_qxrbs0K3J5+u3_setrd2NOqE4ADCmuGG-i+5KNoeBb9g6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:29:33 -0700
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, davidgow@...gle.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, jose.exposito89@...il.com, javierm@...hat.com,
andrealmeid@...eup.net, melissa.srw@...il.com,
siqueirajordao@...eup.net, Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>,
magalilemes00@...il.com, tales.aparecida@...il.com,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] kunit: Use KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ macro
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 2:27 PM Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net> wrote:
>
> Use KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ to compare memory blocks in replacement of the
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ macro. Therefor, the statement
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, memcmp(foo, bar, size), 0);
>
> is replaced by:
>
> KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, foo, bar, size);
>
> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@...eup.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
I didn't go and find the appropriate commit from the drm tree to base
this on, so I couldn't apply it locally.
But looking at the diff itself, looks good!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists