[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MW5PR84MB1842824E0F57D0EC46381B09AB9D9@MW5PR84MB1842.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 22:49:17 +0000
From: "Elliott, Robert (Servers)" <elliott@....com>
To: "'<Vishal Badole>'" <badolevishal1116@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"inux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <inux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "chinmoyghosh2001@...il.com" <chinmoyghosh2001@...il.com>,
"mintupatel89@...il.com" <mintupatel89@...il.com>,
"vimal.kumar32@...il.com" <vimal.kumar32@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Common clock: To list active consumers of clocks
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <Vishal Badole> <badolevishal1116@...il.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2022 1:25 PM
> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>; mturquette@...libre.com; inux-
> clk@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: chinmoyghosh2001@...il.com; mintupatel89@...il.com;
> vimal.kumar32@...il.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Common clock: To list active consumers of clocks
>
...
> We will remove above prints in the revised patch. We are facing
> indentation issue whle printing consumer in summary
> as given below
> enable prepare protect duty hardware per-user
> clock count count count rateccuracy phase cycle enable consumer count
> clk_mcasp0_fixed 0 0 0 24576000 0 50000 Y
> deviceless 0
Consider making the kernel output simple, greppable, and parseable (e.g.,
comma-separated fields, one entry per line, no multi-line column headers)
and let a userspace tool do the fancy formatting.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists