lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:38:08 +0100
From:   Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To:     Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 1/3] sched/topology: Add NUMA-based CPUs
 spread API

On 02/08/22 09:40, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> On 7/30/2022 8:29 PM, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/28/2022 10:12 PM, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>>> Implement and expose API that sets the spread of CPUs based on distance,
>>> given a NUMA node.  Fallback to legacy logic that uses
>>> cpumask_local_spread.
>>>
>>> This logic can be used by device drivers to prefer some remote cpus over
>>> others.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>>   include/linux/sched/topology.h |  5 ++++
>>>   kernel/sched/topology.c        | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>>>
>>
>> ++
>>
>> Dear SCHEDULER maintainers,
>>
>> V3 of my series was submitted ~12 days ago and had significant changes.
>> I'd appreciate your review to this patch, so we could make it to the
>> upcoming kernel.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tariq
>
> Hi,
> Another reminder.
> Do you have any comments on this patch?
> If not, please provide your Ack.

It's not even been a week since you submitted v4 (and ~3 days since you
last pinged this thread), and not all of us are limitless reviewing
machines :-)

This is already in my todo-list, but isn't the topmost item yet.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ