linux-kernel - Re: [Patch RFC net-next 1/4] net: dsa: microchip: modify vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220802103253.z7jryvmnef5bzdww@skbuf>
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:32:53 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@...rochip.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Patch RFC net-next 1/4] net: dsa: microchip: modify vlan_add
 function prototype

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 08:47:30PM +0530, Arun Ramadoss wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.h b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.h
> index 42c50cc4d853..6529f2e2426a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8.h
> @@ -38,9 +38,8 @@ int ksz8_mdb_del(struct ksz_device *dev, int port,
>  		 const struct switchdev_obj_port_mdb *mdb, struct dsa_db db);
>  int ksz8_port_vlan_filtering(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, bool flag,
>  			     struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> -int ksz8_port_vlan_add(struct ksz_device *dev, int port,
> -		       const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan,
> -		       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> +int ksz8_port_vlan_add(struct ksz_device *dev, int port, u16 vlan_vid,

I don't see an impediment to naming "vlan_vid" just "vid".

> +		       u16 flags);
>  int ksz8_port_vlan_del(struct ksz_device *dev, int port,
>  		       const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan);

Won't you convert vlan_del too?