[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YukBz6t1n3aMbznT@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:51:59 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND] x86/bus_lock: Don't assume the init value of
DEBUGCTLMSR.BUS_LOCK_DETECT to be zero
* Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com> wrote:
> It's possible that BIOS/firmware has set DEBUGCTLMSR_BUS_LOCK_DETECT, or
> this kernel has been kexec'd from a kernel that enabled bus lock
> detection.
>
> Disable bus lock detection explicitly if not wanted.
Makes sense.
Just curious: in what circumstances does the BIOS/firmware set
DEBUGCTLMSR_BUS_LOCK_DETECT? Does it use it, or does it enable it for some
spurious reason, without really using the feature? (Assuming you are aware
of instances where this happened - or was this simply a hypothetical?)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists