[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b43b3babb8aea836add289245c640688bec87829.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2022 18:42:44 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, studentxswpy@....com
Cc: jaegeuk@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@...tino.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] f2fs: Replace kmalloc() with f2fs_kmalloc
On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 11:23 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 05:22:02PM +0800, studentxswpy@....com wrote:
> > From: Xie Shaowen <studentxswpy@....com>
> >
> > replace kmalloc with f2fs_kmalloc to keep f2fs code consistency.
>
> For that removing f2fs_kmalloc entirely would be way better.
Dunno, maybe doubtful as there's a specific "fault injector" test
built around f2fs_<foo>alloc. (CONFIG_F2FS_FAULT_INJECTION)
For a student lesson, it would significantly better to compile any
patch, especially to avoid broken patches, before submitting them.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists