[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YukFgFTaq4Aw+uht@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:07:44 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees
<linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/numa: Use cpumask_available instead of hardcoded
NULL check
* Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me> wrote:
> GCC warning log:
> ===========================================================================
>
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c: In function ‘cpumask_of_node’:
> arch/x86/mm/numa.c:916:39: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘false’ for the address of ‘node_to_cpumask_map’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
> 916 | if (node_to_cpumask_map[node] == NULL) {
> | ^~
Your fix makes sense I suppose, but I'm wondering how testing didn't
trigger this warning.
Off-stack isn't a rare config option:
kepler:~/tip> make allmodconfig
#
# No change to .config
#
kepler:~/tip> grep CPUMASK_OFFSTACK .config
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y
kepler:~/tip>
What am I missing?
> Fixes: c032ef60d1aa ("cpumask: convert node_to_cpumask_map[] to cpumask_var_t")
> Fixes: de2d9445f162 ("x86: Unify node_to_cpumask_map handling between 32 and 64bit")
These are ancient commits from 2009 & 2011.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists