linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: Add Allwinner D1 LDOs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1659448901.659907.8416.nullmailer@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 02 Aug 2022 08:01:41 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc:     linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] regulator: dt-bindings: Add Allwinner D1 LDOs

On Tue, 02 Aug 2022 00:32:12 -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> The Allwinner D1 SoC contains two pairs of in-package LDOs. One pair is
> for general purpose use. LDOA generally powers the board's 1.8 V rail.
> LDOB generally powers the in-package DRAM, where applicable.
> 
> The other pair of LDOs powers the analog power domains inside the SoC,
> including the audio codec, thermal sensor, and ADCs. These LDOs require
> a 0.9 V bandgap voltage reference. The calibration value for the voltage
> reference is stored in an eFuse, accessed via an NVMEM cell.
> 
> Neither LDO control register is in its own MMIO range; instead, each
> regulator device relies on a regmap/syscon exported by its parent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
>  - Remove syscon property from bindings
>  - Update binding examples to fix warnings and provide context
> 
>  .../allwinner,sun20i-d1-analog-ldos.yaml      | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-ldos.yaml      | 57 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/allwinner,sun20i-d1-analog-ldos.yaml
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-ldos.yaml
> 

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-ldos.example.dtb:0:0: /example-0/syscon@...0000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['allwinner,sun20i-d1-system-control']

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/

This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit.