linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] LoongArch: Add stacktrace support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <59d9ef26-d378-b311-82a9-95fc8d14a8a6@loongson.cn>
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:01:15 +0800
From:   Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
To:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc:     WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Jinyang He <hejinyang@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] LoongArch: Add stacktrace support



On 2022/8/2 上午9:30, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Qing,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 9:20 AM zhangqing <zhangqing@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2022/8/1 下午11:30, Huacai Chen wrote:
>>> Hi, Qing,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:17 PM Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Use common arch_stack_walk infrastructure to avoid duplicated code and
>>>> avoid taking care of the stack storage and filtering.
>>>> Add sra (means __schedule return address) and scfa (means __schedule call
>>>> frame address) to thread_info and store it in switch_to().
>>>>
>>>> Now we can print the process stack by cat /proc/*/stack and can better
>>>> support ftrace.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@...ngson.cn>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/loongarch/Kconfig                 |  5 ++++
>>>>    arch/loongarch/include/asm/processor.h |  9 +++++++
>>>>    arch/loongarch/include/asm/switch_to.h | 14 ++++++----
>>>>    arch/loongarch/include/asm/uaccess.h   |  4 +--
>>>>    arch/loongarch/kernel/Makefile         |  1 +
>>>>    arch/loongarch/kernel/asm-offsets.c    |  2 ++
>>>>    arch/loongarch/kernel/process.c        |  3 +++
>>>>    arch/loongarch/kernel/stacktrace.c     | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    arch/loongarch/kernel/switch.S         |  2 ++
>>>>    9 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>    create mode 100644 arch/loongarch/kernel/stacktrace.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>>> index 2b44edc604a2..a8ae2af4025a 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/uaccess.h
>>>> @@ -229,13 +229,13 @@ extern unsigned long __copy_user(void *to, const void *from, __kernel_size_t n);
>>>>    static inline unsigned long __must_check
>>>>    raw_copy_from_user(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
>>>>    {
>>>> -       return __copy_user(to, from, n);
>>>> +       return __copy_user(to, (__force const void *)from, n);
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>>    static inline unsigned long __must_check
>>>>    raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
>>>>    {
>>>> -       return __copy_user(to, from, n);
>>>> +       return __copy_user((__force void *)to, from, n);
>>> Why this? Does it have something to do with stacktrace?
>>>
>>> Huacai
>>
>> Hi, huacai
>>
>> This is kernel test robot report sparse warnings:
>> I reproduced locally and found that other architectures calling
>> __copy_user also use __force conversion, Is this modification appropriate?
>>
>> kernel/trace/trace_events_user.c: note: in included file (through
>> include/linux/uaccess.h, include/linux/sched/task.h,
>> include/linux/sched/signal.h, ...):
>>      arch/loongarch/include/asm/uaccess.h:232:32: sparse: sparse:
>> incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) @@     expected
>> void const *from @@     got void const [noderef] __user *from @@
>>      arch/loongarch/include/asm/uaccess.h:232:32: sparse:     expected
>> void const *from
>>      arch/loongarch/include/asm/uaccess.h:232:32: sparse:     got void
>> const [noderef] __user *from
> The modification might be correct, but should it be in this patch?
> 
> Huacai
I will send this patch separately,  it has nothing to do with the series 
patch.

arch/loongarch/kernel/ptrace.c: note: in included file (through 
include/linux/uaccess.h, include/linux/sched/task.h, 
include/linux/sched/signal.h, include/linux/ptrace.h, include/linux/audit.h)

-Qing
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Qing
>>
>>
>>