lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YunMXRhAM5g3tNnJ@sol.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 18:16:13 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
Cc:     Dipanjan Das <mail.dipanjan.das@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058 
        <syzbot+c70d87ac1d001f29a058@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        linux-kernel-mentees 
        <linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-security-modules <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kernel/watch_queue: Make pipe NULL while clearing
 watch_queue

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 12:19:05AM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Aug 2022 21:46:42 +0530  Dipanjan Das <mail.dipanjan.das@...il.com> wrote:
> > Are you referring to the reproducer attached to our original report?
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANX2M5bHye2ZEEhEV6PUj1kYL2KdWYeJtgXw8KZRzwrNpLYz+A@mail.gmail.com/
>  
> Yes, I meant the reproducer you gave.
> 
> I suspect I must have missed CONFIG_WATCH_QUEUE=y while setting the kernel
> up, extremely sorry for it.
> 
> I now tried 5.10.y with it (using a modification of syzkaller's dashboard
> config I had been using[1]), and I'm getting a __post_watch_notification()
> crash (which is a related crash, as the fix[2][3] for that causes the
> reproducer to not reproduce the post_one_notification crash on mainline),
> but not the post_one_notification() crash you had reported. It seems if I
> apply my patch, it doesn't trigger this related crash, so these bugs are
> seem to be very related maybe due to racing? I haven't looked at that yet.
> 
> I then tried on v5.10.131 since that was the exact version you had
> reproduced on, and it reproduces the post_one_notification() error
> successfully. Applying 353f7988dd84 causes __post_watch_notification()
> crash, and then applying this v3 patch does not trigger the issue, but
> the patch to fix __post_watch_notification() crash is [2], which does
> not really address the issue of post_one_notification() crash which
> is due to the dangling reference to a freed pipe.
> 
> Can you please try reproducer at your end?
> 
> Thanks,
> Siddh

There were several watch_queue fixes that got merged in v5.10.134, so there's no
point in testing v5.10.131.  If you're still seeing a bug in the *latest*
5.10.y, then please check whether it's also present upstream.  If yes, then send
out a fix for it.  If no, then tell stable@...r.kernel.org what commit(s) need
to be backported.  Please provide *full* details in each case, including any
KASAN reports or other information that would help people understand the bug.

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ