[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220803120711.172364-1-yin31149@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 20:07:12 +0800
From: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@...il.com>
To: guwen@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc: 18801353760@....com, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
borisp@...dia.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, jakub@...udflare.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kafai@...com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, paskripkin@...il.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
songliubraving@...com,
syzbot+5f26f85569bd179c18ce@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yhs@...com, yin31149@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] net/smc: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2)
On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 at 19:27, Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> Hi Hawkins,
>
> Since the fix v3 doesn't involved smc codes any more, I wonder if it's still
> appropriate to use 'net/smc:' in subject?
>
> Cheers,
> Wen Gu
Thank you for reminding me, I will send the v4 patch with new subject.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists