linux-kernel - Re: [greybus-dev] Re: [PATCH linux-next] staging: greybus:using the

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YupqXVa+RYm4Ul+m@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:30:21 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc:     cgel.zte@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] Re: [PATCH linux-next] staging: greybus:using the

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 07:00:21AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 8/3/22 1:30 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 06:22:58AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> > > From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> > > 
> > > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to instade of  pm_runtime_get_sync
> > > and pm_runtime_put_noidle.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> > > Signed-off-by:  <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/greybus/core.c | 3 +--
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/greybus/core.c b/drivers/greybus/core.c
> > > index e546c6431877..b9063e86534b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/greybus/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/greybus/core.c
> > > @@ -174,9 +174,8 @@ static int greybus_probe(struct device *dev)
> > >   	if (!id)
> > >   		return -ENODEV;
> > > -	retval = pm_runtime_get_sync(&bundle->intf->dev);
> > > +	retval = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&bundle->intf->dev);
> > >   	if (retval < 0) {
> > > -		pm_runtime_put_noidle(&bundle->intf->dev);
> > >   		return retval;
> > >   	}
> > > -- 
> > > 2.25.1
> > 
> > Now this is just being silly.  Consider all future emails also dropped.
> 
> 
> No Greg, please don't do this, or please undo this.
> 
> This happened because the original poster was not a subscriber to the
> greybus-dev mailing list.  Such messages get held until someone (me)
> releases them after picking them out from the mostly spam that is
> caught and held.  I have been trying to do that daily lately but
> it's still not enough to avoid this happening.
> 
> You were on the original addressee list.  So you got the message
> immediately.  But the mailing list filter held it and sent it
> again when I released it yesterday.  This is why you saw it the
> second time.
> 
> Ye Xingchen had nothing to do with your receiving the message twice.

Ah, ok.  But they did send a number of patches like this while after I
had sent my first request to not do patches in this format anymore,
which is what caused my response here.

thanks,

greg k-h