lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:48:58 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     broonie@...nel.org,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 2

On 8/3/22 08:03, broonie@...nel.org wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20220728:
> 
> The hid tree gained a build failure which I fixed up.
> 
> The thermal tree gained a build failure, I used the version from 20220728
> instead.
> 
> The net-next tree gained a conflict against the net tree.
> 
> The kvm tree gained a conflict with the kvms390-fixes tree.
> 
> The pinctrl tree gained a build failure for which I reverted a commit.
> 
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 12734
>  12594 files changed, 1319236 insertions(+), 278745 deletions(-)
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I have created today's linux-next tree at
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/next/ ).  If you
> are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"
> to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the
> old one.  You should use "git fetch" and checkout or reset to the new
> master.
> 
> You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees
> file in the source.  There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log
> files in the Next directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built
> with an arm64 defconfig, an allmodconfig build for x86_64, a
> multi_v7_defconfig for arm and a native (arm64) build of tools/perf.
> 

Hi broonie,

Thanks for keeping linux-next up while Stephen is on vacation.

What is missing here is powerpc build (ppc64_defconfig), since the
architecture is often used for cross-compile test.

And I think since we're at merge window for 6.0, we need to say
"Please do not add material for 6.1 until 6.0-rc1 have been
released".

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ