[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XWxMis61zouPeAoTUC6xYz7rSUC33wdvyLii0Cd2j4Ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 06:50:35 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Rajeev Nandan <quic_rajeevny@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] drm/msm/dsi: Use the new regulator bulk feature to
specify the load
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:12 AM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 03/08/2022 01:37, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > As of commit 6eabfc018e8d ("regulator: core: Allow specifying an
> > initial load w/ the bulk API") we can now specify the initial load in
> > the bulk data rather than having to manually call regulator_set_load()
> > on each regulator. Let's use it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>
> It might have been better, if the previous patch had only removed the
> load_setting on disable and inlined the dsi_host_regulator_disable().
> Then this patch would drop the regulator_set_load() from
> dsi_host_regulator_enable() path and inline it. Then it would have been
> more obvious that after these two changes the time when we set loads is
> not changed.
Seems like I should post a v4 to update the commit message of the
final patch in the series, but I'm going to leave this the way it is
since the end result is the same. Originally when I wrote the series I
didn't know if the new regulator API changes would be accepted, so the
previous patch did the most cleanup it could do with the old API. ;-)
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists