[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YuqHvu4zAzwq+BdZ@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 16:35:42 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] printk for 5.20
On 2022-08-02 20:19:34 [-0700], Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Seriously, even if you have strict RT requirements, you may also have
> strict debugging requirements, and if something goes wrong, you want
> to KNOW ABOUT IT. At that point, your RT rules may well fly out the
> window, because you have more serious problems.
>
> End result: no way will I accept this kind of completely arbitrary and
> frankly not very intelligent patch.
>
> If people want to disable console printing, that's THEIR CHOICE. It
> could be a new config variable where you ASK people about what they
> want. Not this kind of idiotic tying together of things.
I don't argue about the loss in debugging with disabled consoles and I
spare you the time explaining how it got there.
Petr, do you revert it yourself or do you want me to send a revert?
> Linus
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists