linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] printk for 5.20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 12:06:57 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] printk for 5.20

On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 17:43:12 +0200
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:

> On the positive side. My intuition told me that it was very controversial.
> This is why I clearly described the effect. And it was the very first
> sentence in the commit message. I think that I made it _very visible_.

Right. I do not see you doing anything to lose Linus's trust. You stated
upfront exactly what it was doing. And let Linus decide if it was right or
not. Maybe it was a misjudgment on your part. But chalk it up as a learning
experience. I personally find you a good maintainer.

-- Steve