[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fcb0e878-29ff-e408-ccf3-3b594160c0df@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:49:08 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] perf/x86/core: Remove unnecessary stubs provided
for KVM-only helpers
On 4/8/2022 3:26 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Remove CONFIG_PERF_EVENT=n stubs for functions that are effectively
> KVM-only. KVM selects PERF_EVENT and will never consume the stubs.
> Dropping the unnecessary stubs will allow simplifying x86_perf_get_lbr()
Giggling, I used to have a similar cleanup patch sitting in a corner somewhere.
> by getting rid of the impossible-to-hit error path (which KVM doesn't
> even check).
>
> Opportunstically reorganize the declarations to collapse multiple
> CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS #ifdefs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 53 ++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index cc47044401ff..aba196172500 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -509,46 +509,18 @@ extern u64 perf_get_hw_event_config(int hw_event);
> extern void perf_check_microcode(void);
> extern void perf_clear_dirty_counters(void);
> extern int x86_perf_rdpmc_index(struct perf_event *event);
> -#else
> -static inline void perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(struct x86_pmu_capability *cap)
> -{
> - memset(cap, 0, sizeof(*cap));
> -}
>
> -static inline u64 perf_get_hw_event_config(int hw_event)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void perf_events_lapic_init(void) { }
> -static inline void perf_check_microcode(void) { }
> -#endif
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
> extern struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
> extern int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr);
> -#else
> -struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr, void *data);
> -static inline int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
> -{
> - return -1;
> -}
> -#endif
> +extern void intel_pt_handle_vmx(int on);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL */
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL
> - extern void intel_pt_handle_vmx(int on);
> -#else
> -static inline void intel_pt_handle_vmx(int on)
> -{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD
> +extern void amd_pmu_enable_virt(void);
> +extern void amd_pmu_disable_virt(void);
>
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD)
> - extern void amd_pmu_enable_virt(void);
> - extern void amd_pmu_disable_virt(void);
> -
> -#if defined(CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS_AMD_BRS)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS_AMD_BRS
>
> #define PERF_NEEDS_LOPWR_CB 1
>
> @@ -566,12 +538,13 @@ static inline void perf_lopwr_cb(bool lopwr_in)
> static_call_mod(perf_lopwr_cb)(lopwr_in);
> }
>
> -#endif /* PERF_NEEDS_LOPWR_CB */
Oops, now the definition of PERF_NEEDS_LOPWR_CB will not be unset.
This is not mentioned in the commit message and may cause trouble.
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS_AMD_BRS */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD */
>
> -#else
> - static inline void amd_pmu_enable_virt(void) { }
> - static inline void amd_pmu_disable_virt(void) { }
> -#endif
> +#else /* !CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
> +static inline void perf_events_lapic_init(void) { }
> +static inline void perf_check_microcode(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS */
>
> #define arch_perf_out_copy_user copy_from_user_nmi
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists