linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/10] Encrypted Hibernation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YusZ8gD/LjiAXadR@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:59:30 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@...ora.tech>
Cc:     Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...gle.com>, zohar@...ux.ibm.com,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Hao Wu <hao.wu@...rik.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, axelj <axelj@...s.com>,
        keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Encrypted Hibernation

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 11:36:43AM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 3:33 PM Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org> wrote:
> 
> > One more bump here, as we'd really love to get encrypted hibernation
> > to a form upstream would accept if at all possible. We were
> > considering landing this in our Chrome OS tree for now, then coming
> > back in a couple months with a "we've been baking this ourselves and
> > it's going so great, oooh yeah". I'm not sure if upstream would find
> > that compelling or not. But in any case, some guidance towards making
> > this more upstream friendly would be well appreciated.
> >
> > One thing I realized in attempting to pick this myself is that the
> > trusted key blob format has moved to ASN.1. So I should really move
> > the creation ticket to the new ASN.1 format (if I can figure out the
> > right OID for that piece), which would allow me to drop a lot of the
> > ugly stuff in tpm2_unpack_blob(). Maybe if I get no other comments
> > I'll work on that and resend.
> 
> I've been revamping my TPM-backed verified hibernation implementation
> based on this work, so I'd definitely be enthusiastic about it being
> mergeable.

BTW, is it tested with QEMU + swtpm?

BR, Jarkko