linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 4/9] sched/uclamp: Make select_idle_capacity() use util_fits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220804143609.515789-5-qais.yousef@arm.com>
Date:   Thu,  4 Aug 2022 15:36:04 +0100
From:   Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan JMChen <Jonathan.JMChen@...iatek.com>,
        Hank <han.lin@...iatek.com>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] sched/uclamp: Make select_idle_capacity() use util_fits_cpu()

Use the new util_fits_cpu() to ensure migration margin and capacity
pressure are taken into account correctly when uclamp is being used
otherwise we will fail to consider CPUs as fitting in scenarios where
they should.

Fixes: b4c9c9f15649 ("sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path")
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index ea02c64cd933..3079ca867f2c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6603,21 +6603,23 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 static int
 select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
-	unsigned long task_util, best_cap = 0;
+	unsigned long task_util, util_min, util_max, best_cap = 0;
 	int cpu, best_cpu = -1;
 	struct cpumask *cpus;
 
 	cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_rq_mask);
 	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
 
-	task_util = uclamp_task_util(p);
+	task_util = task_util_est(p);
+	util_min = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN);
+	util_max = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
 
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
 		unsigned long cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu);
 
 		if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu) && !sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
 			continue;
-		if (fits_capacity(task_util, cpu_cap))
+		if (util_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, cpu))
 			return cpu;
 
 		if (cpu_cap > best_cap) {
-- 
2.25.1