lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 08:29:13 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@...il.com> Cc: kafai@...com, 18801353760@....com, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, borisp@...dia.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, guwen@...ux.alibaba.com, jakub@...udflare.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, paskripkin@...il.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, songliubraving@...com, syzbot+5f26f85569bd179c18ce@...kaller.appspotmail.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, yhs@...com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2) On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 11:05:15 +0800 Hawkins Jiawei wrote: > I wonder if it is proper to gather these together in a patchset, for > they are all about flags in sk_user_data, maybe: > > [PATCH v5 0/2] net: enhancement to flags in sk_user_data field > - introduce the patchset > > [PATCH v5 1/2] net: clean up code for flags in sk_user_data field > - refactor the things in include/linux/skmsg.h and > include/net/sock.h > - refactor the flags's usage by other code, such as > net/core/skmsg.c and kernel/bpf/reuseport_array.c > > [PATCH v5 2/2] net: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2) > - add SK_USER_DATA_PSOCK flag in sk_user_data field Usually the fix comes first, because it needs to be backported to stable, and we don't want to have to pull extra commits into stable and risk regressions in code which was not directly involved in the bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists