linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: bcm: use absolute path to other schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <143a7faf-70fc-010f-bdbd-9f96f918c280@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 11:11:23 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        arm@...nel.org, soc@...nel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Broadcom internal kernel review list 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
        Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: soc: bcm: use absolute path to other
 schema

On 7/26/22 10:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/07/2022 17:59, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 7/26/22 04:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Absolute path to other DT schema is preferred over relative one.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>
>> Are you applying those patches or do you want the SoC maintainer to do that?
> 
> The best if  you (SoC maintainer) would pick them up. If you cannot or
> it is too late for this, maybe arm-soc could grab them (already Cced).

Arnd ended up picking up patches 1 and 2, FWIW.
-- 
Florian