linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] PM: domains: Reverse the order of performance and enabling ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1355f1f6-d6c9-6d5f-9b5f-333084c6561b@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 23:58:34 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] PM: domains: Reverse the order of performance and enabling
 ops

29.07.2022 12:46, Abel Vesa пишет:
>> I have looped in Dmitry and Thierry to see if they think the change
>> should be fine for Tegra platforms too.
>>
> Good. But the tegra usecase uses only the ->set_performance and does not
> use ->power_on and ->power_off for that specific PD. So I don't think
> their usecase will be affected by the order reverse.
> 

For Tegra it indeed shouldn't change anything.