[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220803193444.3b43730d@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 19:34:44 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@...inx.com>
Cc: <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<richardcochran@...il.com>, <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
<andrei.pistirica@...rochip.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
<harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>, <michal.simek@....com>,
<harini.katakam@....com>, <radhey.shyam.pandey@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Macb PTP enhancements
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 16:13:44 +0530 Harini Katakam wrote:
> From: Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>
>
> This series is a follow up for patches 2 and 3 from a previous series:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca4c97c9-1117-a465-5202-e1bf276fe75b@microchip.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220517135525.GC3344@hoboy.vegasvil.org/
> Sorry for the delay.
>
> ACK is added only to patch 3 (now patch 2).
> Patch 1 is updated with check for gem_has_ptp as per Claudiu's comments.
These were separated from the earlier series as non-fixes, right?
But we are in the period of merge window right now, when all the
new features flow to Linus's tree and we only take fixes to avoid
conflicts and give maintainers time to settle the existing ones.
So these need to wait until -rc1 is cut. (Or is patch 1 a bug fix?
I can't tell.)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists