linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8.1, 0/7] Add LVTS architecture thermal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 19:08:08 -0400
From:   Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>
To:     bchihi@...libre.com
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        amitk@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, khilman@...libre.com,
        mka@...omium.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, james.lo@...iatek.com,
        fan.chen@...iatek.com, louis.yu@...iatek.com,
        rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com, abailon@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8.1, 0/7] Add LVTS architecture thermal

On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 03:09:05PM +0200, bchihi@...libre.com wrote:
> From: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@...libre.com>
> 
> This series moves thermal files related to MediaTek to the mediatek folder.
> And introduce the new architecture LVTS (low voltage thermal sensor) driver to report
> the highest temperature in the SoC and record the highest temperature sensor,
> each sensor as a hot zone.
> The LVTS body is divided into two parts, the LVTS controller and the LVTS device.
> The LVTS controller can connect up to 4 LVTS devices, and each LVTS device
> can connect up to 7 TSMCUs.
> 
> The architecture will be the first to be used on mt8192 and mt8195.
> 
> Changelog:
> Changes in v8.1 :

Please use whole numbers, no need to make this more confusing, v9 would've been
just fine :-).

Thanks,
Nícolas