lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YuzFIx36zDXX0z/0@sol.localdomain>
Date:   Fri, 5 Aug 2022 00:22:11 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel-mentees 
        <linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kernel/watch_queue: Improve struct annotation
 formatting

On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 07:00:23PM +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> Improve formatting struct annotations in watch_queue.h, so that they
> fall in the preferred 80 character limit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>

This patch isn't just fixing overly long lines, but rather is introducing
kerneldoc comments and documenting things that weren't documented before.
That's fine, but please make the commit message accurately describe the patch.

> diff --git a/include/linux/watch_queue.h b/include/linux/watch_queue.h
> index fc6bba20273b..c99c39ec6548 100644
> --- a/include/linux/watch_queue.h
> +++ b/include/linux/watch_queue.h
> @@ -18,57 +18,103 @@
>  
>  struct cred;
>  
> +/**
> + * watch_type_filter - Filter on watch type

If you're going to use kerneldoc comments, they should be correctly formatted.
This is not, since it's missing the word struct.  You can run this command to
see the kerneldoc warnings:

	./scripts/kernel-doc -v -none include/linux/watch_queue.h

> + * @lock: Spinlock

Please make sure that comments provide useful information and don't just repeat
what the code says.

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ