[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220805114438.102085-1-chao.gao@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 19:44:38 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hch@...radead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, jxgao@...gle.com,
Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: avoid potential left shift overflow
The second operand passed to slot_addr() is declared as int or unsigned int
in all call sites. The left-shift to get the offset of a slot can overflow
if swiotlb size is larger than 4G.
Fixes: 26a7e094783d ("swiotlb: refactor swiotlb_tbl_map_single")
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index c5a9190b218f..391b03b72978 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size
}
}
-#define slot_addr(start, idx) ((start) + ((idx) << IO_TLB_SHIFT))
+#define slot_addr(start, idx) ((start) + ((phys_addr_t)(idx) << IO_TLB_SHIFT))
/*
* Carefully handle integer overflow which can occur when boundary_mask == ~0UL.
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists