linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86,mm: print likely CPU at segfault time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73b1d17ec26b4f769a3eda7f9e2edbc10f38ea78.camel@surriel.com>
Date:   Fri, 05 Aug 2022 08:54:23 -0400
From:   Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Dave Jones <dsj@...com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]  x86,mm: print likely CPU at segfault time

On Fri, 2022-08-05 at 09:59 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com> wrote:
> 
> > The show_unhandled_signals variable seems to be controlled through 
> > /proc/sys/debug/exception-trace, and be on by default.
> 
> Indeed ... then this too should be pointed out in the changelog.
> 
Will do.

> Plus the patch doesn't build on top of the latest upstream kernel, 
> x86-defconfig:

Urgh, let me fix that too. I'm not sure what happened
there, I might have done the kernel build in a different
directory than where the code was :(

v3 coming soon.

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)