[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yu0o3J2T5QwKtoan@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:27:40 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] x86,mm: print likely CPU at segfault time
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:16:44AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index fad8faa29d04..c7a5bbf40367 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -769,6 +769,8 @@ show_signal_msg(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
> unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> const char *loglvl = task_pid_nr(tsk) > 1 ? KERN_INFO : KERN_EMERG;
> + /* This is a racy snapshot, but it's better than nothing. */
> + int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
Please read this in exc_page_fault() and hand it down to helpers.
Alternatively, I'm being told there's a patchset in the works which
will allow for any exception handler to pass in additional information
downwards through an extended pt_regs. Then, saving the CPU number on
which the handler is running would work generically everywhere.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists