linux-kernel - Re: [5.19.0] [aarch64] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/page_alloc.c:5407 __alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220805150820.3q4kwrlh7qrt7poa@bogus>
Date:   Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:08:20 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        CKI Project <cki-project@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [5.19.0] [aarch64] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at
 mm/page_alloc.c:5407 __alloc_pages+0x1a0/0x290

On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:59:55PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 11:47:57AM +0200, Bruno Goncalves wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Since commit "c1c76700a0d6" we started to hit the following call trace
> > on aarch64 VMs when looking at journalctl log
> >
> > kernel: Mountpoint-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072
> > bytes, linear)
> > kernel: ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, CPU and cache topology may be inaccurate
> > kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > kernel: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/page_alloc.c:5407 __alloc_pages+0x1a0/0x290
> > kernel: Modules linked in:
> > kernel: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.19.0 #1
> > kernel: pstate: 20400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > kernel: pc : __alloc_pages+0x1a0/0x290
> > kernel: lr : alloc_page_interleave+0x24/0xbc
> > kernel: sp : ffff80000803bb90
> > kernel: x29: ffff80000803bb90 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
> > kernel: x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000
> > kernel: x23: 000000000000001e x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 000000000000001e
> > kernel: x20: 000000000000001e x19: 0000000000040b20 x18: 0000000000000014
> > kernel: x17: 6e69206562207961 x16: 6d2079676f6c6f70 x15: 6f74206568636163
> > kernel: x14: 20646e6120555043 x13: 6574617275636361 x12: 6e69206562207961
> > kernel: x11: 6d2079676f6c6f70 x10: 6f74206568636163 x9 : ffffa4f6617fd5e8
> > kernel: x8 : ffffa4f663ed0440 x7 : 0000000000000007 x6 : 0000000000000000
> > kernel: x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000000
> > kernel: x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffa4f663c53532
> > kernel: Call trace:
> > kernel:  __alloc_pages+0x1a0/0x290
> > kernel:  alloc_page_interleave+0x24/0xbc
> > kernel:  alloc_pages+0x10c/0x16c
> > kernel:  kmalloc_order+0x3c/0xc0
> > kernel:  kmalloc_order_trace+0x38/0x130
> > kernel:  __kmalloc+0x2e8/0x350
> > kernel:  detect_cache_attributes+0x9c/0x110
> > kernel:  update_siblings_masks+0x34/0x270
> > kernel:  store_cpu_topology+0x7c/0xc0
> > kernel:  smp_prepare_cpus+0x34/0x108
> > kernel:  kernel_init_freeable+0x108/0x1b8
> > kernel:  kernel_init+0x30/0x150
> > kernel:  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > kernel: ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> > kernel: Early cacheinfo failed, ret = -12
> > kernel: cblist_init_generic: Setting adjustable number of callback queues.
> > kernel: cblist_init_generic: Setting shift to 2 and lim to 1.
> >
> 
> Thanks for the report. I will see if I can reproduce by forcing the absence
> of PPTT which is something I haven't tested after I fixed hotplug issues
> reported with my changes.

OK I was able to reproduce this easily by just saying PPTT doesn't exist
on my system. Not sure if my recent changes made this issue show up easily
or it existed even w/o my changes but it is stupid issue :(.

Can you check if this fixes it for you ? I can post the patch once
you confirm. We assign negative/error value to unsigned int and then
the number of leaves ends up with that value because of wrong comparison.

Regards,
Sudeep

-->8
diff --git i/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c w/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index 587543c6c51c..97c42be71338 100644
--- i/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
+++ w/arch/arm64/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,

 int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
 {
-       unsigned int ctype, level, leaves, fw_level;
+       unsigned int ctype, level, leaves;
+       int fw_level;
        struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);

        for (level = 1, leaves = 0; level <= MAX_CACHE_LEVEL; level++) {
@@ -63,6 +64,9 @@ int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
        else
                fw_level = acpi_find_last_cache_level(cpu);

+       if (fw_level < 0)
+               return fw_level;
+
        if (level < fw_level) {
                /*
                 * some external caches not specified in CLIDR_EL1