[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220805153834.2510142-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 17:38:30 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org
Cc: rui.zhang@...el.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] thermal/core: Rearm the monitoring only one time
The current code calls monitor_thermal_zone() inside the
handle_thermal_trip() function. But this one is called in a loop for
each trip point which means the monitoring is rearmed several times
for nothing (assuming there could be several passive and active trip
points).
Move the monitor_thermal_zone() function out of the
handle_thermal_trip() function and after the thermal trip loop, so the
timer will be disabled or rearmed one time.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
---
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
index b4c68410c158..4e1a83987b99 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
@@ -383,11 +383,6 @@ static void handle_thermal_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
handle_critical_trips(tz, trip, trip_temp, type);
else
handle_non_critical_trips(tz, trip);
- /*
- * Alright, we handled this trip successfully.
- * So, start monitoring again.
- */
- monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
}
static void update_temperature(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
@@ -503,6 +498,8 @@ void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
for (count = 0; count < tz->num_trips; count++)
handle_thermal_trip(tz, count);
+
+ monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_device_update);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists